Redistribution: A Primer on 21st Century Economic Theory

A teacher wants to get across to her students the evils of redistribution.

She believes redistribution is a socialist, communist, liberal plot to undermine America.
It is the doctrine of moochers and takers not makers and shakers.
It makes people dependent and fails to "incentivize"  them for success.
Redistribution is an out and out evil.
Unfair, unjust, immoral, and unconstitutional.
It undermines the very foundations of society.
It kills the desire  to work hard for low wages.
"How fair would a grading system be that made the A's give points to the B's and C's and D's,
And, God forbid, even to the F's!", she says.
"That's  how redistribution works.
The people who earned it have to give to those who didn't."
Of course, students in a course and people in America do not all start at the same starting line.
Some, with privileged backgrounds, start already many yards ahead.
Others start way behind the line.
The teacher calls it a fair race nonetheless.
Some earned their A through hard work,
But others earned their A by starting well ahead.
Some earned a C because they started way behind
And made more progress than any of the A's.
The teacher is right but in the wrong direction.
For the last many decades wealth in America has been redistributed up not down.
The rich have taken from the middle class and the poor,
And in the act have surpassed the Age of the Robber Barons.
The rich raided everyday people's bank accounts once Glass-Steagall was repealed.
They created a lucrative poverty industry out of payday loans, check cashing, and usurious credit cards.
They harvested companies by laying off workers, lowering wages, and raiding pension funds.
They made derivatives out of liar loans and foreclosed on homes.
They bought politicians, got subsidies, cut health care, and left the rest of us with the bill.
They claimed they had "earned it" when they had inherited wealth or had famous parents.
They demanded meritocracy for others  but no inheritance tax for their  kids so they would not have to compete.
They colluded to rig Libor rates and raise CEO pay, but decried unions.
They had the Supreme Court pass Citizens United so the corporations and the rich could steal elections.
They sought to restrict voting, just in case their money wouldn't turn the trick.
Then they claimed the election was stolen when they lost,
Because it was their God-given right to win.
So the teacher was confused about who the moochers were.
If redistribution is a Commie plot, then our rich are Commies through and through.
Though I suspect the teacher is happy with the rich taking from the rest of us,
After all, they're rich, so they MUST be smart, as any social Darwinist knows.
For our teacher, downward redistribution-- the sort Christ was for-- is evil.
And upward redistribution is good, since when wealth trickles down to the poor the rich can take it again and "grow" the economy.
Our teacher probably calls herself a good Christian,
But she is in fact a devout Milton Friedmanian.
For the record, trickle down--supply side--economics is a fraud and economies grow by consumption.
Workers with no jobs or bad wages can't buy anything.
See, it had nothing really to do with morality but only with capitalism,
A system we should try.
In the 21st Century there is another case for downward redistribution beyond consumption.
It is a sort of Christian argument on steroids for helping those who have fallen behind.
Today our world is imperiled by complex systems and fierce conflicts.
The earth and the human species are challenged as never before.
You don't slay a dragon with an A.
It takes a team whose strength is no better than its weakest link.
Faced with the dragon's fire, you can bet that the best gives to the worst to get them up to speed,
Before the whole team is burnt to a crisp.
If you're a warrior fighting at the dragon's feet,
You don't ask whether the healer was once a slacker or deprived,
You damn well see to it he will be ready to save you when you are about to die,
And vice versa.
That's how to survive a major dungeon in the World of Warcraft.
And that's how the army takes  a hill in a bloody battle in the desert, though in America rich kids don't go to war.
You redistribute your butt off until everyone is the best they can be.
The team becomes better, smarter, and sometimes braver than anyone in it
Then you don't just get a silly A, you gain victory.
The guild gives you the best drop.
And the army gives you a medal for saving not just yourself but all of us.
You earned it, but you couldn't have done it without the team.
The battle for the earth and for life on our planet,
For the survival of the human species,
Is already joined.
The dragon is at the gates.
Don't bring your A to the battle and brag about it,
Or your money and tell us how hard your parents worked to give it to you.
Bring the respect you won when you buffed your team mates so they could help you save the day.
When the dragon roars, you need people to watch your back, not admire your golden ass.
If you don't believe this, as I know you won't,
See what happens when you stand before the dragon alone and show him your A.
Tell him the others are not there  because they didn't get an A.
As you perish, you might even scream, "It's isn't fair, they weren't as good as me".
Ah, but I hear you say, "I've got you now,
I will bring a team of only A's,
People all as good and smart as me.
People who towed the line and did what they were told".
Too bad you didn't know this particular dragon was impervious to a team of only standard skills.
What you really need now is that screwed up dwarf,
The one you earlier denied drops you really didn't need.
What he might have become is what you need now to save yourself.
"But, surely", you say, "Helping should be a matter of charity,
Not the government or the team telling me what to do".
You are right, you should not be forced on the team.
You can sit it out and hope those you wouldn't help will help you.
But perhaps I'm wrong,
And you'll be just fine,
Alone with your own kind. 

She believes redistribution is a socialist, communist, liberal plot to undermine America.

It is the doctrine of moochers and takers not makers and shakers.

It makes people dependent and fails to "incentivize"  them for success.

 

Redistribution is an out and out evil.

Unfair, unjust, immoral, and unconstitutional.

It undermines the very foundations of society.

It kills the desire  to work hard for low wages.

 

"How fair would a grading system be that made the A's give points to the B's and C's and D's,

And, God forbid, even to the F's!", she says.

"That's  how redistribution works.

The people who earned it have to give to those who didn't."

 

Of course, students in a course and people in America do not all start at the same starting line.

Some, with privileged backgrounds, start already many yards ahead.

Others start way behind the line.

The teacher calls it a fair race nonetheless.

 

Some earned their A through hard work,

But others earned their A by starting well ahead.

Some earned a C because they started way behind

And made more progress than any of the A's.

 

The teacher is right but in the wrong direction.

For the last many decades wealth in America has been redistributed up not down.

The rich have taken from the middle class and the poor,

And in the act have surpassed the Age of the Robber Barons.

 

The rich raided everyday people's bank accounts once Glass-Steagall was repealed.

They created a lucrative poverty industry out of payday loans, check cashing, and usurious credit cards.

They harvested companies by laying off workers, lowering wages, and raiding pension funds.

They made derivatives out of liar loans and foreclosed on homes.

 

They bought politicians, got subsidies, cut health care, and left the rest of us with the bill.

They claimed they had "earned it" when they had inherited wealth or had famous parents.

They demanded meritocracy for others  but no inheritance tax for their  kids so they would not have to compete.

They colluded to rig Libor rates and raise CEO pay, but decried unions.

 

They had the Supreme Court pass Citizens United so the corporations and the rich could steal elections.

They sought to restrict voting, just in case their money wouldn't turn the trick.

Then they claimed the election was stolen when they lost,

Because it was their God-given right to win.

 

So the teacher was confused about who the moochers were.

If redistribution is a Commie plot, then our rich are Commies through and through.

Though I suspect the teacher is happy with the rich taking from the rest of us,

After all, they're rich, so they MUST be smart, as any social Darwinist knows.

 

For our teacher, downward redistribution-- the sort Christ was for-- is evil.

And upward redistribution is good, since when wealth trickles down to the poor the rich can take it again and "grow" the economy.

Our teacher probably calls herself a good Christian,

But she is in fact a devout Milton Friedmanian.

 

For the record, trickle down--supply side--economics is a fraud and economies grow by consumption.

Workers with no jobs or bad wages can't buy anything.

See, it had nothing really to do with morality but only with capitalism,

A system we should try.

 

In the 21st Century there is another case for downward redistribution beyond consumption.

It is a sort of Christian argument on steroids for helping those who have fallen behind.

Today our world is imperiled by complex systems and fierce conflicts.

The earth and the human species are challenged as never before.

 

You don't slay a dragon with an A.

It takes a team whose strength is no better than its weakest link.

Faced with the dragon's fire, you can bet that the best gives to the worst to get them up to speed,

Before the whole team is burnt to a crisp.

 

If you're a warrior fighting at the dragon's feet,

You don't ask whether the healer was once a slacker or deprived,

You damn well see to it he will be ready to save you when you are about to die,

And vice versa.

 

That's how to survive a major dungeon in the World of Warcraft.

And that's how the army takes  a hill in a bloody battle in the desert, though in America rich kids don't go to war.

You redistribute your butt off until everyone is the best they can be.

The team becomes better, smarter, and sometimes braver than anyone in it

 

Then you don't just get a silly A, you gain victory.

The guild gives you the best drop.

And the army gives you a medal for saving not just yourself but all of us.

You earned it, but you couldn't have done it without the team.

 

The battle for the earth and for life on our planet,

For the survival of the human species,

Is already joined.

The dragon is at the gates.

 

Don't bring your A to the battle and brag about it,

Or your money and tell us how hard your parents worked to give it to you.

Bring the respect you won when you buffed your team mates so they could help you save the day.

When the dragon roars, you need people to watch your back, not admire your golden ass.

 

If you don't believe this, as I know you won't,

See what happens when you stand before the dragon alone and show him your A.

Tell him the others are not there  because they didn't get an A.

As you perish, you might even scream, "It's isn't fair, they weren't as good as me".

 

Ah, but I hear you say, "I've got you now,

I will bring a team of only A's,

People all as good and smart as me.

People who towed the line and did what they were told".

 

Too bad you didn't know this particular dragon was impervious to a team of only standard skills.

What you really need now is that screwed up dwarf,

The one you earlier denied drops you really didn't need.

What he might have become is what you need now to save yourself.

 

"But, surely", you say, "Helping should be a matter of charity,

Not the government or the team telling me what to do".

You are right, you should not be forced on the team.

You can sit it out and hope those you wouldn't help will help you.

 

But perhaps I'm wrong,

And you'll be just fine,

Alone with your own kind. 

 

 

Comments

I think grading students is a

I think grading students is a sticky subject. There needs to be some sort of grading yes but grade students on their effort not their ability.
-Nolan Ollis

There must be a grading

There must be a grading system of some sort. Afterall, the New York Rangers just won 4-3 over the Tampa Bay Lightning. Imagine a world with no point/grading system? The question is what rubric do we use? How do we measure how much one has learned and put a grade on it? A might get an A, but B might have learned ton more than A and only get a B. Perhaps it should be reversed and A get a B and B receive an A? We need a new ruler.

A new system of measurement?

A new system of measurement? Possibly, but the way things are measured is irrelevant next to what's being measured. Use any grading scale you like, no matter how hard the others try it is the monkey that will climb the tree fastest. In that test, he was born with an A.

We all have different talents, different things that we focus on and favor, but our schools are not based on student-driven learning. Instead, the students must all learn precisely what is being tested, so that they can pass said tests. We are not all clones of each other, despite our similarities, so why are we being educated as though all of us are the same...

Except but as a means to make us that way.

What is being measured and

What is being measured and who is being measured is really the main focus I see. Our schools today really have their intentions leveled as more important than students' intentions. I can relate to this because my senior year of high school we were state champions of football and our quarterback received full rides to the top schools in our states, despite his grades. It was his talent in football that got him this. But what about the other students who study diligently to even get accepted to these high demanding colleges? Is it fair to allow one student who barely passed into such a great school with such low grades to attend this college and not to allow others because their grades weren't the top of the top? Who knows if those students who were not accepted into these colleges had talents of their own..just not in football or a popular sport

I think that athletes deserve

I think that athletes deserve to get offers from the colleges, pending their grades. Going somewhere like Wake Forest or Duke should be a privelage who put in work on a off the work, sport wise and academically related.

It offers both its economic

It offers both its economic theory can contribute to the explanation and interpretation of economic relations, can also predict the economic effects of the administrative decisions, increase in the price of a commodity is characterized by demand great flexibility will lead to lower demand for a greater proportion of high-priced.



ملك القتال

That was wonderful! I wish

That was wonderful!

I wish people understood your metaphors more... I've recently been thinking about writing something about "the value of a dollar" in today's America. something along the lines of your Age of Robber Barons. I particularly liked when you refered to the army, survival, the team--we could be so strong if only we respected our fellow Americans enough to work together.

I'm glad I read the whole thing. Thanks!

Thanks for the

Thanks for the comment--something on the Robber Barons and how it applies to today would be great.

 

I notify that this is the

I notify that this is the first place where I find issues and Feel really happy to have seen webpage, You're very smart writer and look forward for more entertaining times reading here rolling wire carts on wheels

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.